GID Reform Advocates
Because our identities are not disordered

GID (Adult)
GID (Child)
The Book

Gender Madness in American Psychiatry Gender Madness in American Psychiatry: Essays from the Struggle for Dignity,
by Kelley Winters (2008)

Sexual and Gender Diagnoses of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM), A Reevaluation , Karasic and Drescher, Eds. (2005)
Order from IFGE
Winters Images Maritime and Landscape Photography
scenes of serenity amidst a world of turbulence and intolerance

Essay Series on Gender Diagnoses in the DSM-V

June 16, 2008

Beyond Denial: GID Diagnostic Criteria and Gender-Conversion Therapies

Read and post comments at

This essay is also posted with more comments on The Bilerico Project, Daily Experiments in LGBTQ.

Kelley Winters, Ph.D.

GID Reform Advocates



On May 9th and 23rd, the American Psychiatric Association (APA) issued statements on “GID and the DSM,” repeating that,


“It is important to recognize that the DSM is a diagnostic manual and does not provide treatment recommendations or guidelines.”(1)


This was in response to concern from the transgender community and allies that the current “gender identity disorder” (GID) diagnosis is biased to facilitate gender-conversion therapies.  These are punitive psychotherapies attempting to change the gender identities of gender variant youth and adults, exemplified in a May 7 National Public Radio interview of Dr. Kenneth Zucker (chairman of the DSM-V Sexual and Gender Identity Disorders work group) which described his therapy regimen for a gender-nonconforming child he diagnosed with gender identity disorder: 


“Bradley would no longer be allowed to spend time with girls. He would no longer be allowed to play with girlish toys or pretend that he was a female character. Zucker said that all of these activities were dangerous to a kid with gender identity disorder.” (2)


Such harsh shame and punishment, for behaviors which would be ordinary or exemplary for other children assigned female at birth, drew outrage from many transitioned individuals who themselves were forced to grow up in painfully incongruent gender roles.


A recent joint statement from the National Center for Trangender Equality and other leading advocacy organizations echoed broad concern about gender-conversion and sexual-orientation-conversion therapies:


“It is inconceivable that in the 21st century any credible scientist or medical professional would recommend any discredited treatment that would attempt to change a person’s core gender identity or sexual orientation. Such treatments have no empirical basis and are harmful”(3).


However, the APA’s denial of any treatment guidance in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, (DSM) has been repeated often in recent weeks (4) and is stated bluntly on the APA DSM FAQ page,


“No information about treatment is included.” (5)


But does repeating a thing often enough make it true?  In fact, diagnostic nomenclature and treatment are inseparably intertwined.  This is because the efficacy of all drug and psychotherapy treatments are judged according to specific diagnostic criteria listed in the DSM and ICD.  For example, it stands to reason that the efficacy and marketability of a psychopharmacological product could be expediently improved by tweaking DSM diagnostic criteria to favor it’s strengths.  In response to concerns of influence by drug manufacturers on diagnostic nomenclature(6), the APA requires disclosure of financial ties to pharmaceutical corporations by members of the DSM-V Task Force.


What does the the current DSM-IV-TR imply about gender-conversion treatment?  Kids and adults driven deep in the closet by gender-conversion therapies no longer meet the four diagnostic criteria for GID (7) and are emancipated from diagnosis of mental disorder. On the other hand, affirmed youth and adults who are happy and well adjusted after transition remain diagnosable with GID and suffer stigma of mental illness and sexual deviance for the rest of their lives (8,9). Children may be diagnosed with GID strictly on the basis of gender nonconformity, without evidence of gender dysphoria or distress with assigned birth sex (criteria A,B).  Adults and adolescents are implicated with “disordered” gender identity so long as they identify with or pass as other than their assigned birth sex or believe that they were “born the wrong sex” (criteria A,B).  Furthermore, current GID criteria fail to clarify that clinically significant distress or impairment, the basis for defining mental illness in the DSM, should exclude societal or family prejudice or intolerance (criterion D). Therefore, discrimination itself can be used as a basis to label transitioned or gender nonconforming victims as mentally ill.


The APA statement also mentioned the appointment of a new task force, separate from the DSM effort, to “review the scientific and clinical literature on GID treatment” (1). At this date it is not known who is on this treatment task force or what kinds of treatment it will favor. In any case, the problem of treatment bias within the GID diagnostic criteria remains unaffected by the efforts of a separate APA treatment task force.


While the current GID diagnostic criteria do not explicitly recommend gender-conversion therapy, they are certainly biased to favor that harmful treatment approach and to contradict the legitimacy of transition.  This is a major reason the DSM-V is of great importance to the transgender community and supportive mental health care providers. I hope that the DSM-V Task Force will move beyond denial and beyond archaic gender stereotypes in drafting new diagnostic nomenclature that does not harm those it is intended to help.



(1) American Psychiatric Association, “APA STATEMENT ON GID AND THE DSM-V, “ APAStatements/APAStatementonGIDandTheDSMV.aspx , May 23, 2008,


(2) A. Speigel, “Two Families Grapple with Sons’ Gender Preferences,” National Public Radio, All Things Considered,” , May 7, 2008.


(3) National Center for Transgender Equality (NCTE), Transgender Law and Policy Institute (TLPI), Transgender Law Center (TLC), Transgender Youth Family Allies (TYFA),  , May 28, 2008.  (Disclosure, I was involved in the drafting of this statement)


(4) M. Forstein, “Update on the DSM-V Issue,” , May 15, 2008.


(5) American Psychiatric Association, “Frequently Asked Question About DSM,”


(6) L. Cosgrove, S. Krimsky, M. Vijayaraghavan, L. Schneider, “Financial Ties between DSM-IV Panel Members and the Pharmaceutical Industry,” Psychotherapy and Psychodynamics, Vol 75, No 3, , 2006.


(7) American Psychiatric Association, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision, 2000, p. 537.


( 8 ) K. Winters, “Issues of GID Diagnosis for Transsexual Women and Men,” , 2004/2008.


(9) K. Winters, “Issues of Psychiatric Diagnosis for Gender Nonconforming Youth,” , 2004/2008.

Copyright © 2008 Kelley Winters, GID Reform Advocates

Blog Index:

10 Reasons Why
the TF Diagnosis
Has Got to Go
Comments on
Draft Revisions
to the DSM5
Why You
Should Sign
the Petition
Medical Necessity
Update: Statement
on GID & TF
in the DSM-V
WPATH Presentation:
Revision Suggestions
for Gender Diagnoses
Guest Blog
Stop Sexualizing Us!
Guest Blog
Aligning Bodies with Minds
Call to Action for Affirming APA Position Statements
Beyond Conundrum: Strategies for Diagnostic Harm Reduction
Transvestic Disorder and Policy Dysfunction in the DSM-V
Book Announcement:
Gender Madness in American Psychiatry
Guest Blog
What is the Body For?
Guest Blog
DES's Other Daughters
The Gender Gulag:
Voices of the Asylum
Autogynephilia, Infallible
Derogatory Hypothesis
Part 2
Autogynephilia, Infallible
Derogatory Hypothesis
Part 1
Disordered Identities,
The Ambiguously Sexual Fetish
Disallowed Identities,
Disaffirmed Childhood
Blinded Me With Science:
The Burden of Proof
Balancing Views on
Gender Diversity
in the DSM-V Process
Blinded Me with Science:
Devolution of the DSM
Diagnosis vs. Treatment:
Psychosexual Stigma
Diagnosis vs. Treatment:
Barriers to Medical Care
Blinded Me With Science:
Sampling Error
Top Ten Problems
with the GID Diagnosis
Disordered Identities:
The Focus of Pathology
Diagnosis vs. Treatment:
Horns of a False Dilemma
Maligning Terminology:
Language of Oppression
Beyond Denial:
GID Diagnostic Criteria and Gender-Conversion Therapies

Read and post comments to this essay series at gidreform.

You may need to enable javascript active content to view all of this page

Send comments and suggestions about this site to
Return to the Home Page
Copyright © 2004,2009 Kelley Winters, GID Reform Advocates