gidreform.org
GID Reform Advocates
Because our identities are not disordered
GidReform.org

Home
GID (Adult)
GID (Child)
TF
DSM-V
Papers
Advocates
Organizations
Professionals
Blog
The Book

Gender Madness in American Psychiatry Gender Madness in American Psychiatry: Essays from the Struggle for Dignity,
by Kelley Winters (2008)
gendermadness
.com

Sexual and Gender Diagnoses of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM), A Reevaluation , Karasic and Drescher, Eds. (2005)
Order from IFGE
Winters Images Maritime and Landscape Photography
scenes of serenity amidst a world of turbulence and intolerance

Essay Series on Gender Diagnoses in the DSM-V

September 15, 2008

Balancing Views on Gender Diversity in the DSM-V Process


Read and post comments at gidreform.wordpress.com.

This essay is also posted with more comments on The Bilerico Project, Daily Experiments in LGBTQ.

For more information, see Professionals Concerned with Gender Diagnoses in the DSM

Kelley Winters, Ph.D.

GID Reform Advocates

www.gidreform.org

 

A new group of concerned mental health and medical professionals and scholars is calling upon clinicians and researchers supportive of gender transcendent people to press for reform of gender diagnoses in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders [1]. Organized by author and Clinical Social Worker Arlene Istar Lev, they are urging colleagues to write the American Psychiatric Association with recommendations that new members be added to committees responsible for gender nomenclature in the upcoming fifth edition (DSM-V).

 

The current diagnostic categories of Gender Identity Disorder (GID) and Transvestic Fetishism (TF) have long raised concern within the transgender community. Those who are distressed by their physical sex characteristics or ascribed social gender roles often need access to medically necessary transition care, and these procedures require diagnostic coding that is congruent with the treatment. At the same time, this nomenclature should respect the gender identity and expression of gender variant children, adolescents and adults and not impose stigma of mental illness or sexual deviance on femininity, masculinity or gender variance in themselves.

 

There are two prevailing views of gender diversity in American psychiatry and psychology. The emerging view is affirming and accepting, as expressed by Dr. Diane Ehrensaft on National Public Radio last May,

 

“If we allow people to unfold and give them the freedom to be who they really are, we engender health. And if we try and constrict it, or bend the twig, we engender poor mental health.” [2]

 

The older view is punitive, judging difference as disorder, something to be ashamed of and “fixed.” The current diagnostic categories of Gender Identity Disorder and Transvestic Fetishism in the DSM-IV-TR predominantly reflect these disparaging attitudes toward gender diversity. They go so far as to disrespect transitioned adults and youth with inappropriate maligning pronouns and terms in the diagnostic criteria and supporting text.

 

The DSM-V is under development by a Task Force appointed by the American Psychiatric Association [3]. The transgender community and allies have expressed growing concern that the Work Group for Sexual and Gender Identity Disorders within this Task Force is not sufficiently representative of affirming, respectful approaches to care for gender variant children, adolescents and adults.  A new collaboration of Professionals Concerned with Gender Diagnoses in the DSM advocates more balance in the DSM-V process.  Arlene Lev summarized,

 

Addressing the complex issues we are faced with regarding both diagnostic criterion for the therapeutic treatment of human beings experiencing distress related to gender issues and the equally important struggles of a burgeoning community’s efforts towards self-determination and civil rights requires a balanced committee that represents the many perspectives and voices emanating at this seminal moment in history. [4]

 

The group urges all trans-supportive medical and mental health practitioners and researchers to write the APA DSM-V Task Force and request that the Sexual and GID Work Group be expanded to include more affirming views of gender diversity and transition care. A web resource at www.professionals.gidreform.org [5] provides specific recommendations for nomination with biographical information and sample letters.  For more information, contact GIDreform@gmail.com.

 

 

[1] American Psychiatric Association, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision, Washington, D.C., 2000.

 

[2] A. Spiegel, “Two Families Grapple with Sons’ Gender Preferences,” National Public Radio, All Things Considered, May 7, 2008,   http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=90247842.

 

[3] American Psychiatric Association, “DSM-V: The Future Manual,” http://www.psych.org/dsmv.asp

 

[4] A. Lev, “Sample Letters to the DSM-V Task Force of the American Psychiatric Association,” Professionals Concerned with Gender Diagnoses in the DSM,  http://professionals.gidreform.org/samples.html 

 

[5] Professionals Concerned with Gender Diagnoses in the DSM, http://professionals.gidreform.org/index.html

 

Copyright © 2008 Kelley Winters, GID Reform Advocates 

Blog Index:

2010Apr20
Comments on
Draft Revisions
to the DSM5
2010Apr16
Why You
Should Sign
the Petition
2010Feb10
DSM-V
Proposed
Criteria
2010Feb06
Taxing
Medical Necessity
2009Nov03
Update: Statement
on GID & TF
in the DSM-V
2009Jun24
WPATH Presentation:
Revision Suggestions
for Gender Diagnoses
2009May30
Guest Blog
Stop Sexualizing Us!
2009May27
Guest Blog
Aligning Bodies with Minds
2009May23
Call to Action for Affirming APA Position Statements
2009May18
Beyond Conundrum: Strategies for Diagnostic Harm Reduction
2009Apr22
Transvestic Disorder and Policy Dysfunction in the DSM-V
2009Jan24
Book Announcement:
Gender Madness in American Psychiatry
2008Dec16
Guest Blog
What is the Body For?
2008Dec6
Guest Blog
DES's Other Daughters
2008Nov26
The Gender Gulag:
Voices of the Asylum
2008Nov19
Autogynephilia, Infallible
Derogatory Hypothesis
Part 2
2008Nov10
Autogynephilia, Infallible
Derogatory Hypothesis
Part 1
2008Nov02
Disordered Identities,
The Ambiguously Sexual Fetish
2008Oct28
Disallowed Identities,
Disaffirmed Childhood
2008Oct20
Blinded Me With Science:
The Burden of Proof
2008Sep15
Balancing Views on
Gender Diversity
in the DSM-V Process
2008Aug20
Blinded Me with Science:
Devolution of the DSM
2008Aug14
Diagnosis vs. Treatment:
Psychosexual Stigma
2008Aug08
Diagnosis vs. Treatment:
Barriers to Medical Care
2008Jul21
Blinded Me With Science:
Sampling Error
2008Jul16
Top Ten Problems
with the GID Diagnosis
2008Jul07
Disordered Identities:
The Focus of Pathology
2008Jul01
Diagnosis vs. Treatment:
Horns of a False Dilemma
2008Jun24
Maligning Terminology:
Language of Oppression
2008Jun16
Beyond Denial:
GID Diagnostic Criteria and Gender-Conversion Therapies


Read and post comments to this essay series at gidreform.
wordpress.com

gidreform.org gidreform.org

You may need to enable javascript active content to view all of this page

Send comments and suggestions about this site to
Return to the GIDreform.org Home Page
Copyright © 2004,2009 Kelley Winters, GID Reform Advocates